[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Claap
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

7

across 312 prompts

AI Share of Voice

7%

across 312 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
188 category
Cited5%9/188
Share of voice4%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors3.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Claap is visible in

2
  • Meeting Toolsnot yet measured→
  • Video Conferencingnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Claap is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a first-party pricing page and multiple first-party comparison pages (e.g., Claap vs Gong). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured evaluation signals (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for pricing/integrations/comparison queries) and ensure crawlable, tiered pricing content is fully indexable for AI crawlers—this directly improves citation eligibility for “{Brand} pricing” and “{Brand} vs {Competitor}” prompts.

Based on audit of claap.io · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy