[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/CharityEngine
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

7

across 348 prompts

AI Share of Voice

7%

across 348 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Shortlist Position

0/80

Not Visible · Crm Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
212 category
Cited3%7/212
Share of voice3%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories CharityEngine is visible in

2
  • CRMnot yet measured→
  • Marketing Automationnot yet measured→

Your visibility gap

CharityEngine surfaces in 0/80 Crm discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim CharityEngine →

Executive summary

CharityEngine is already strong for evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor” queries because it has first-party comparison pages (e.g., CharityEngine vs Bloomerang, DonorPerfect, Blackbaud, Bonterra). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand crawlable, schema-backed “how it works” and “best nonprofit CRM software” discovery content (currently the shortlist tier is Not Visible at 0/80), so AI engines can cite it for pre-brand CRM explainer and enterprise/mid-market fit questions.

Based on audit of charityengine.net · Jun 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy