AI Visibility
measured13/100
Emerging · in Nonprofit Software
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals52/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 348 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 348 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Crm Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Nonprofit Software
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories CharityEngine is visible in
2Your visibility gap
CharityEngine surfaces in 0/80 Crm discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
CharityEngine is already strong for evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor” queries because it has first-party comparison pages (e.g., CharityEngine vs Bloomerang, DonorPerfect, Blackbaud, Bonterra). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand crawlable, schema-backed “how it works” and “best nonprofit CRM software” discovery content (currently the shortlist tier is Not Visible at 0/80), so AI engines can cite it for pre-brand CRM explainer and enterprise/mid-market fit questions.
Based on audit of charityengine.net · Jun 4, 2026