AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Identity Provider
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals52/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 163 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 163 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Identity Provider
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Cerby is a B2B IAM/IAM-adjacent SaaS brand with strong primary review authority on G2 (25 reviews, 4.6★) and meaningful first-party content around disconnected apps and identity automation. The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage evaluation queries—especially "How much does Cerby cost?"—because the site does not expose crawlable, tiered pricing content (it appears to route to booking/contact). Highest-ROI fix: publish a crawlable pricing page (tiers + prices) and add first-party "Cerby vs Okta" / "Cerby vs Microsoft Entra ID" evaluation pages that are indexed and self-contained.
Based on audit of cerby.com · Oct 4, 2026