[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Campaignmonitor
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

62

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

6

across 163 prompts

AI Share of Voice

2%

across 145 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
84 category
Cited1%1/84
Share of voice1%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
11 brand-level
Cited64%7/11
Share of voice64%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited60%3/5
Share of voice47%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited57%4/7
Share of voice43%avg
Engine consensus50%of engines
Competitors2.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Campaignmonitor is visible in

1
  • Email Marketingnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Campaign Monitor is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts because it has first-party comparison content (e.g., “Campaign Monitor vs. Mailchimp” and “Campaign Monitor vs. Constant Contact”) and a publicly crawlable pricing page. The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/unclear enterprise analyst signals (Gartner/Forrester/IDC) and likely incomplete structured data coverage (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) for the exact evaluation queries—fixing this should unlock more consistent citation in “best email marketing software” and “alternatives to Campaign Monitor” shortlists.

Based on audit of campaignmonitor.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy