AI Visibility
measured24/100
Emerging · in Marketing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals46/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 336 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 318 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Marketing
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Campaigner is likely to be cited for category-level queries (e.g., “email marketing software” / “marketing automation”) because it has meaningful third-party review presence (Capterra shows 428 reviews at 3.9, and TrustRadius shows 18 reviews). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage queries that require first-party comparison and crawlable pricing surfaces (no first-party “Campaigner vs …” pages found in live search; pricing tiers not verifiably crawlable from campaigner.com in the signals gathered). Highest-ROI fix: publish/SSR-index first-party comparison pages and ensure a crawlable, tiered pricing page on campaigner.com that AI engines can read.
Based on audit of campaigner.com · Apr 1, 2026