AI Visibility
measured11/100
Emerging · in Video Conferencing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals46/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
15
across 350 prompts
AI Share of Voice
13%
across 332 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Video Conferencing
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
butter.us is a B2B SaaS (virtual workshop/facilitation platform) and has strong first-party crawlable pricing plus multiple first-party comparison pages (e.g., Butter vs SessionLab, Microsoft Teams). The biggest AI-citation risk is weak/unclear third-party review authority: G2 shows only ~20 reviews (and no clear Leader/High Performer badge signal in the live snippet), while TrustRadius shows only 6 reviews—so AI engines may not reliably shortlist Butter for “best [category] software” queries.
Based on audit of butter.us · Apr 1, 2026