[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Bloomreach
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

68

across 610 prompts

AI Share of Voice

69%

across 589 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
477 category
Cited66%317/477
Share of voice62%avg
Engine consensus44%of engines
Competitors3.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
15 brand-level
Cited87%13/15
Share of voice87%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
9 brand-level
Cited67%6/9
Share of voice67%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
9 brand-level
Cited67%6/9
Share of voice67%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Bloomreach is visible in

3
  • Customer Data Platform10 of 57→
  • Marketing Automation65 of 158→
  • E-commerce Platformsnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Bloomreach is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (738 reviews, 4.6/5) and secondary B2B review/analyst signals including TrustRadius (321 reviews) and Gartner Peer Insights (profile exists). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation surfaces for AI (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and crawlable comparison/pricing pages) so models can cite Bloomreach directly for “X vs Y” and “pricing” prompts rather than relying on third-party review sites.

Based on audit of bloomreach.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy