AI Visibility
measured58/100
Frequently Cited · in Prototyping
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals41/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
43
across 348 prompts
AI Share of Voice
43%
across 348 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Prototyping
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Balsamiq is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (501 reviews, 4.2/5) and first-party comparison content (e.g., Balsamiq vs Figma). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen Structured Data + Technical AEO (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating and AI-crawler crawlability), since pricing and comparisons are present but schema/crawl signals were not verifiable via live search.
Based on audit of balsamiq.com · Oct 7, 2026