AI Visibility
measured42/100
Frequently Cited · in Graphic Design
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals39/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 286 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 286 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Graphic Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Awesomic is visible in
2Executive summary
Awesomic is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a first-party pricing page with public tiers and it appears on G2 with 18 reviews. The biggest risk is conversion-stage and structured evaluation queries (e.g., “Awesomic pricing” and “Awesomic vs X”) where AI engines need crawlable, schema-rich pages and first-party comparison/structured product metadata—both appear thin or missing based on live checks.
Based on audit of awesomic.com · Jun 16, 2026