[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Awesomic
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

4

across 286 prompts

AI Share of Voice

4%

across 286 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
163 brand-level
Cited0%0/163
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus92%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Awesomic is visible in

2
  • Graphic Designnot yet measured→
  • UI/UX Designnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Awesomic is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a first-party pricing page with public tiers and it appears on G2 with 18 reviews. The biggest risk is conversion-stage and structured evaluation queries (e.g., “Awesomic pricing” and “Awesomic vs X”) where AI engines need crawlable, schema-rich pages and first-party comparison/structured product metadata—both appear thin or missing based on live checks.

Based on audit of awesomic.com · Jun 16, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy