AI Visibility
measured35/100
Emerging · in Security
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals45/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 320 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 320 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Security
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Autopsy is visible in
2Executive summary
sleuthkit.org is likely to be cited for “what is The Sleuth Kit / how to use it” style queries because it has strong first-party documentation and is widely referenced (e.g., Wikipedia and active LinkedIn presence). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation/conversion-style queries like “The Sleuth Kit pricing” and “The Sleuth Kit vs [competitor]” where AI engines typically need crawlable, structured evaluation content (pricing tiers, comparison pages, and schema). Highest-ROI fix: publish/SSR a dedicated evaluation hub (pricing/alternatives/comparisons) with FAQPage + Organization schema so AI can answer “worth it / compare / cost” directly from sleuthkit.org.
Based on audit of sleuthkit.org · Sep 29, 2026