[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Auth0
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

31

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

59

across 511 prompts

AI Share of Voice

59%

across 511 prompts

Category Visibility

#15

in Identity & Access Management · of 81

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
318 category
Cited61%193/318
Share of voice53%avg
Engine consensus51%of engines
Competitors9.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Auth0 is visible in

2
  • Identity Provider12 of 36→
  • Identity & Access Management15 of 81→

Executive summary

Auth0 is strongly positioned to be cited for evaluation and conversion queries because it has a large G2 review base (261 reviews, 4.3/5) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers (e.g., Free $0/month, Essentials $35/month, Professional $240/month). The biggest AI-citation risk is comparison-page coverage for the exact evaluation prompts (e.g., “How does Auth0 compare to Okta?”) and structured-data completeness for SoftwareApplication/FAQPage—without those, AI engines may rely on third-party comparisons instead of citing Auth0 first-party.

Based on audit of auth0.com · Jun 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy