AI Visibility
measured67/100
Frequently Cited · in Identity & Access Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals31/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
74
across 614 prompts
AI Share of Voice
74%
across 614 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Identity & Access Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Auth0 is strongly positioned to be cited for evaluation and conversion queries because it has a large G2 review base (261 reviews, 4.3/5) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers (e.g., Free $0/month, Essentials $35/month, Professional $240/month). The biggest AI-citation risk is comparison-page coverage for the exact evaluation prompts (e.g., “How does Auth0 compare to Okta?”) and structured-data completeness for SoftwareApplication/FAQPage—without those, AI engines may rely on third-party comparisons instead of citing Auth0 first-party.
Based on audit of auth0.com · Jun 6, 2026