[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Appian
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

14

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

42

across 496 prompts

AI Share of Voice

42%

across 496 prompts

Category Visibility

#33

in Workflow Automation · of 298

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
322 category
Cited51%164/322
Share of voice46%avg
Engine consensus55%of engines
Competitors7.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Appian is visible in

2
  • Robotic Process Automation6 of 45→
  • Workflow Automation33 of 298→

Executive summary

Appian is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (G2 + TrustRadius) and enterprise analyst signals (Gartner Magic Quadrant/Peer Insights mentions). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve first-party evaluation surfaces: add/expand crawlable, brand-led comparison pages and ensure structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage) is present on key product/pricing pages so AI can cite Appian directly for “Appian vs X” and “Appian pricing” queries.

Based on audit of appian.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy