AI Visibility
measured53/100
Frequently Cited · in Workflow Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals14/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
49
across 545 prompts
AI Share of Voice
49%
across 545 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Workflow Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Appian is visible in
2Executive summary
Appian is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (G2 + TrustRadius) and enterprise analyst signals (Gartner Magic Quadrant/Peer Insights mentions). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve first-party evaluation surfaces: add/expand crawlable, brand-led comparison pages and ensure structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage) is present on key product/pricing pages so AI can cite Appian directly for “Appian vs X” and “Appian pricing” queries.
Based on audit of appian.com · May 6, 2026