[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Allure Security
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

2

across 617 prompts

AI Share of Voice

2%

across 617 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
388 category
Cited0%0/388
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Allure Security is visible in

3
  • Cloud Securitynot yet measured→
  • Endpoint Protectionnot yet measured→
  • Securitynot yet measured→

Executive summary

Allure Security is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (4.9/5 with 11 reviews) and active, recent first-party content. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “pricing/cost” and “SoftwareApplication/structured evaluation” queries: the site appears to push pricing via demo/contact rather than a crawlable pricing page, and there’s no evidence of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema for AI evaluation prompts.

Based on audit of alluresecurity.com · Aug 10, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy