AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Device Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals61/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
13
across 351 prompts
AI Share of Voice
13%
across 351 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Device Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories ActivTrak is visible in
2Executive summary
ActivTrak is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has substantial third-party review presence (G2: 333 reviews, 4.3/5; TrustRadius: 309 reviews, 8.5/10) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit tiers ($0/$10/$15/$19 per user/month). The highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation surfaces for AI (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and additional indexed comparison/evaluation pages), because those are what enable AI engines to cite the brand directly for “vs/alternatives/pricing” prompts rather than relying on G2/TrustRadius.
Based on audit of activtrak.com · Jun 6, 2026