AI Visibility
measured13/100
Emerging · in Workflow Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 562 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 541 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Workflow Automation
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Activepieces is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts like "What is the best workflow automation software?" and "How does Activepieces compare to n8n?" because it has strong G2 social proof (142 reviews, 4.8★) and first-party comparison content for at least n8n. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/ensure crawlable, schema-backed first-party comparison pages and evaluation Q&A for the exact competitor set (n8n, Zapier, Make, Workato, Albato) plus a crawlable SoftwareApplication/FAQPage layer—this unlocks "alternatives" and "pricing" query patterns where AI needs directly citable on-site blocks.
Based on audit of activepieces.com · Apr 2, 2026