AI Visibility
measured45/100
Frequently Cited · in UI/UX Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals12/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
62
across 659 prompts
AI Share of Voice
62%
across 659 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in UI/UX Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Abstract.com is a B2B SaaS with meaningful AI-citation inputs from G2 (28 reviews, 3.9/5) and TrustRadius (20 reviews, 4.8/10), plus publicly crawlable pricing on goabstract.com. The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor / alternatives” queries: the audited domain does not clearly surface first-party comparison pages, so AI engines have fewer crawlable sources to cite for shortlist formation.
Based on audit of abstract.com · Sep 29, 2026