AI Visibility
measured41/100
Frequently Cited · in Spend Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
86
across 22 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 14 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Spend Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Yooz is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has 347 G2 reviews at 4.4/5 and first-party evaluation content that answers “How does Yooz compare to other AP automation solutions?” ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/products/yooz/reviews?utm_source=openai)). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/ensure first-party, indexed comparison pages that explicitly cover “How does Yooz compare to Stampli?” and “How does Yooz compare to Tipalti?” (and ensure they don’t backfire by framing rival-vs-rival without Yooz leading).
Based on audit of getyooz.com · Aug 29, 2026