AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in AI Recruiting
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals47/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
25
across 387 prompts
AI Share of Voice
25%
across 387 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Recruiting
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Woven is visible in
2Executive summary
Woventeams.com is a B2B technical assessment/hiring platform with publicly crawlable pricing (e.g., $249 + $4,000 per successful hire) and strong outcome messaging, so it can be cited for conversion-stage queries. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage coverage: there are first-party competitor comparison pages (e.g., CoderPad vs Woven, HackerRank vs Woven), but there is no evidence of a robust G2 presence (only 1 G2 review found), which severely limits shortlist inclusion for “best/alternatives” prompts.
Based on audit of woventeams.com · Aug 31, 2026