AI Visibility
measured31/100
Emerging · in Field Service & Workforce
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 310 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 310 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Field Service & Workforce
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Workyard is a B2B construction time tracking/workforce management SaaS and already has strong AI-citation inputs from G2 and first-party comparison content (e.g., Workyard vs ClockShark). The biggest risk for AI engines is evaluation-stage citation for “Workyard vs [competitor]” and “Workyard pricing” if structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and crawlability signals are missing or incomplete—highest ROI fix is to ensure SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema exists on product/pricing/comparison pages and that pricing is fully crawlable/SSR.
Based on audit of workyard.com · May 7, 2026