AI Visibility
measured34/100
Emerging · in Content & Knowledge
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
93
across 103 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 85 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Content & Knowledge
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
WorkRamp is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage queries via its large G2 presence (622 reviews) and active B2B social authority on LinkedIn (10,648 followers). The biggest risk is conversion-stage citation: WorkRamp’s public pricing appears to be referenced via a help-center article rather than clearly crawlable, tiered pricing content on the main domain, which can prevent AI engines from citing exact pricing in “WorkRamp pricing” prompts.
Based on audit of workramp.com · Oct 9, 2026