AI Visibility
measured73/100
Frequently Cited · in FP&A
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
95
across 504 prompts
AI Share of Voice
96%
across 504 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
Brand Accuracy
1/253
citations with inaccuracies
How AI Visibility breaks down
in FP&A
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Workday Adaptive Planning is visible in
1Executive summary
Workday is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage HR software queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., G2 and Gartner Peer Insights) and extensive first-party HR product coverage. The biggest risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “pricing + comparison” citation: Workday’s site appears to avoid publicly crawlable, tiered pricing for core HR/HCM, and first-party “[Workday] vs SAP SuccessFactors / Oracle HCM” pages were not found in live search.
Based on audit of workday.com · Oct 7, 2026