AI Visibility
measured47/100
Frequently Cited · in Web CMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals4/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 737 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 737 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
3/80
Not Visible · Content Knowledge Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Web CMS
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories WordPress.com is visible in
3Your visibility gap
WordPress.com surfaces in 3/80 Content Knowledge discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 77 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
WordPress.com is already cited by AI for “top content management tools for small businesses” and similar shortlist queries (Claude/Gemini), and it has strong third-party review authority on G2 (2,702 reviews, 4.4 rating). The biggest remaining citation blockers for high-intent evaluation queries are missing/weak first-party evaluation surfaces for enterprise/SaaS use cases (e.g., “best content software for small businesses”, “content management software for SaaS companies”) and limited evidence of B2B-specific structured evaluation content (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) on the core product pages.
Based on audit of wordpress.com · May 14, 2026