AI Visibility
measured43/100
Frequently Cited · in Applicant Tracking
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 237 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 237 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Willo.video is already strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a substantial G2 presence and first-party comparison pages (e.g., /comparison and /comparisons/*). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage + pricing/offer markup) and verify AI-crawlability of the canonical pricing page so conversion-stage prompts like “Willo pricing” can be answered directly from willo.video.
Based on audit of willo.video · Jun 4, 2026