AI Visibility
measured34/100
Emerging · in Project Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals32/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
62
across 337 prompts
AI Share of Voice
62%
across 337 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Project Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Voices is visible in
1Executive summary
Voices.com is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a meaningful G2 presence (52 reviews) and strong first-party “what it does” clarity plus an LLM-info page. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage evaluation prompts like “Voices pricing” and “Voices vs Voice123” where AI needs crawlable, structured pricing/comparison content and schema; the highest-ROI fix is to ensure pricing and evaluation pages are fully crawlable/SSR and add B2B evaluation structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) across those pages.
Based on audit of voices.com · Aug 31, 2026