AI Visibility
measured32/100
Emerging · in Feedback Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals50/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
16
across 340 prompts
AI Share of Voice
16%
across 340 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Error Tracking Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Feedback Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Usersnap is visible in
2Your visibility gap
Usersnap surfaces in 0/80 Error Tracking discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Usersnap has solid B2B citation foundations (e.g., 92 G2 reviews at 4.5/5 and a public pricing page), but it is effectively invisible for the highest-intent error-tracking query patterns you listed. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish and index first-party, error-tracking-specific implementation + “how it works” pages (web + mobile + SaaS + enterprise) that directly answer those exact gap questions and are structured for AI extraction.
Based on audit of usersnap.com · Jun 6, 2026