[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Upfront
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

11

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

11

across 144 prompts

AI Share of Voice

11%

across 144 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
76 brand-level
Cited3%2/76
Share of voice1%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors19.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice83%avg
Engine consensus83%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus92%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Upfront is visible in

1
  • Healthcare ITnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Upfront is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (20 reviews, 4.7/5) in the Patient Engagement Software category. The biggest AI citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage self-citation: the site does not expose crawlable pricing and appears to lack first-party “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” pages for direct comparison queries like “How does Upfront compare to Weave?”—so AI must rely on third parties instead of Upfront’s own pages.

Based on audit of upfronthealthcare.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy