AI Visibility
measured34/100
Emerging · in Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
100
across 73 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 73 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Uizard is already well-positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has active G2 and Capterra review presence (e.g., G2 shows 45 reviews and Capterra shows 193 reviews). The biggest risk is conversion-stage citation for “Uizard pricing” and evaluation-stage “Uizard vs competitor” queries if first-party structured comparison/evaluation content (and crawlable structured data) is missing or not consistently indexed—highest-ROI fix: ensure first-party evaluation pages (brand-led vs competitor) and add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data across product/pricing pages.
Based on audit of uizard.io · Sep 1, 2026