AI Visibility
measured10/100
Emerging · in Office & Productivity
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals39/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
11
across 150 prompts
AI Share of Voice
11%
across 150 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Document Collaboration Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Office & Productivity
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Typora is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Typora surfaces in 0/80 Document Collaboration discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Typora is likely cited for “best text editor software” and markdown-writing intent via its first-party product/pricing pages and active support content, but it is weak for AI evaluation-style queries that require structured, crawlable comparison and pricing evidence. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish first-party, crawlable evaluation content that directly targets the buyer query patterns (especially “How does Typora compare to Visual Studio Code?” and “What are the best alternatives to Typora?”) with clear, self-contained answer blocks.
Based on audit of typora.io · May 29, 2026