AI Visibility
measured19/100
Emerging · in Web CMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals3/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
10
across 169 prompts
AI Share of Voice
10%
across 169 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Web CMS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories TYPO3 is visible in
1Executive summary
TYPO3 is already well-positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a G2 presence (35 reviews on G2) and secondary review coverage on Capterra and TrustRadius. The biggest risk pattern is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “pricing / plan / cost” queries: typo3.org appears to focus on governance/community and does not clearly expose crawlable, tiered pricing for the product itself, so AI engines have less first-party pricing content to cite.
Based on audit of typo3.org · Oct 2, 2026