AI Visibility
measured35/100
Emerging · in AI Content Generation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals2/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
22
across 193 prompts
AI Share of Voice
22%
across 193 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Content Generation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Typeface is visible in
2Executive summary
Typefaceapp.com is much more likely to be cited for consumer/prosumer “font manager for Mac” queries than for B2B SaaS evaluation queries. The biggest AI-citation risk is that the site lacks B2B-style evaluation surfaces (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured Q&A and comparison/pricing pages optimized for AI extraction); the single highest-ROI fix is to add crawlable, schema-backed Q&A and software/app structured data that clearly answers “what it is / who it’s for / pricing” in a way LLMs can quote.
Based on audit of typefaceapp.com · Oct 7, 2026