AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Software Marketplace
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals54/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
3
across 438 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 438 prompts
Critical Issues
7
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Software Marketplace
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Twinr is already positioned to be cited for conversion-stage queries like "How much does Twinr cost?" because its pricing page is publicly accessible and shows tiered prices (e.g., Basic $25/mo, Standard $85/mo, Premium $125/mo). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: Twinr has competitor mentions in blog content, but there is no clear evidence of first-party "Twinr vs Appy Pie" / "Twinr vs Adalo" comparison pages that AI can reliably cite for "How does Twinr compare to Appy Pie?" and "How does Twinr compare to Adalo?"
Based on audit of twinr.dev · Sep 1, 2026