[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Tulip
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

17

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

32

across 385 prompts

AI Share of Voice

32%

across 385 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in Manufacturing Execution · of 116

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
246 category
Cited35%87/246
Share of voice29%avg
Engine consensus46%of engines
Competitors15.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Tulip is visible in

2
  • Manufacturing Execution2 of 116→
  • Workflow Automationnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Tulip is a B2B frontline operations/MES-style platform with strong AI-citation foundations from third-party review ecosystems (e.g., G2 shows 36 reviews for “Tulip Interfaces”). ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/products/tulip-interfaces-tulip/reviews?utm_source=openai)) The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led evaluation content (especially “[Tulip] vs [Competitor]” pages and schema) so AI engines can cite Tulip directly for comparison and pricing-evaluation queries rather than relying mostly on third parties.

Based on audit of tulip.co · Jun 12, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy