AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Video Generation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
15
across 177 prompts
AI Share of Voice
15%
across 177 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Video Generation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories TrueNAS is visible in
1Executive summary
TrueNAS (freenas.org) is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 review volume (167 reviews, 4.8★) and is present on Gartner Peer Insights. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage first-party content: freenas.org itself redirects to truenas.com, and there is no evidence (from live search) of first-party pages specifically targeting the exact comparison prompts like “How does TrueNAS compare to Pure Storage FlashArray?” and “How does TrueNAS compare to IBM Storage FlashSystem?”. Highest-ROI fix: create/ensure crawlable, SSR first-party pages on the audited domain identity (TrueNAS) for each exact comparison prompt and add SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data to those pages.
Based on audit of freenas.org · Aug 30, 2026