AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Team Messaging
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals43/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 162 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 162 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Team Messaging Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Team Messaging
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Troop Messenger is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Troop Messenger surfaces in 0/80 Team Messaging discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Troop Messenger has strong third-party credibility signals (e.g., Gartner Peer Insights product page exists and TrustRadius has 20 reviews), but first-party AI evaluation surfaces are weak for high-intent prompts like "How does Troop Messenger compare to Slack?" and "How does Troop Messenger compare to Microsoft Teams?" The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/upgrade first-party, brand-led comparison pages and evaluation FAQs that explicitly target those exact competitor comparison queries and are crawlable/SSR.
Based on audit of troopmessenger.com · Jun 11, 2026