[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Troop Messenger
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

9

across 163 prompts

AI Share of Voice

9%

across 163 prompts

Category Visibility

#57

in Team Messaging · of 70

Critical Issues

6

critical + high

Shortlist Position

0/80

Not Visible · Team Messaging Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
91 category
Cited2%2/91
Share of voice1%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors20.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Troop Messenger is visible in

1
  • Team Messaging61 of 70→

Your visibility gap

Troop Messenger surfaces in 0/80 Team Messaging discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim Troop Messenger →

Executive summary

Troop Messenger has strong third-party credibility signals (e.g., Gartner Peer Insights product page exists and TrustRadius has 20 reviews), but first-party AI evaluation surfaces are weak for high-intent prompts like "How does Troop Messenger compare to Slack?" and "How does Troop Messenger compare to Microsoft Teams?" The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/upgrade first-party, brand-led comparison pages and evaluation FAQs that explicitly target those exact competitor comparison queries and are crawlable/SSR.

Based on audit of troopmessenger.com · Jun 11, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy