AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Scheduling & Calendar
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 161 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 161 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Scheduling & Calendar
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Trafft is a B2B appointment scheduling/booking SaaS with public, crawlable pricing tiers and meaningful third-party review presence (e.g., G2 shows 25 reviews). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage “shortlist” queries that rely on first-party comparison/evaluation content and software-entity structured data—Trafft has first-party comparison pages, but there’s no clear evidence of SoftwareApplication schema on the site and secondary review/analyst signals are thin.
Based on audit of trafft.com · Aug 30, 2026