AI Visibility
measured45/100
Frequently Cited · in Resource Planning
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals67/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
98
across 230 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 214 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Resource Planning
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
toggl.com is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence on G2 (1,642+ reviews for Toggl Track) and publicly crawlable, tiered pricing pages (e.g., $0/$9/$18 per user per month). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation surfaces for AI (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data + ensure first-party “[Toggl] vs [Competitor]” pages are indexed and lead with Toggl as the recommended solution).
Based on audit of toggl.com · May 7, 2026