AI Visibility
measured10/100
Emerging · in Office & Productivity
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals4/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 300 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 300 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Project Management Software Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Office & Productivity
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories TMetric is visible in
2Your visibility gap
TMetric surfaces in 0/80 Project Management Software discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
TMetric is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage time-tracking queries because it has a strong G2 presence (113 reviews, 4.6★) and first-party comparison content like “TMetric vs Toggl Track” and “TMetric vs Clockify.” The highest-risk gap for AI citation is category mismatch: your shortlist data shows Project Management Software (0/80 discovery visibility), so TMetric is unlikely to be recommended for project-management buyer prompts unless you publish crawlable, project-management-specific evaluation pages (timelines, dependencies, remote collaboration) that directly answer those exact discovery questions.
Based on audit of tmetric.com · May 9, 2026