AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in LLMOps Platforms
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
40
across 243 prompts
AI Share of Voice
38%
across 226 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in LLMOps Platforms
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Titan.email is already strongly cited for evaluation-stage queries via third-party review platforms (notably G2 and TrustRadius), so AI engines can shortlist it for “email hosting / email management” alternatives. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/ensure crawlable first-party evaluation content (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage + brand-led comparison pages and a truly crawlable pricing surface), because current pricing is partner-dependent and first-party structured evaluation signals appear thin.
Based on audit of titan.email · Sep 30, 2026