AI Visibility
measured65/100
Frequently Cited · in Business Intelligence
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
77
across 492 prompts
AI Share of Voice
80%
across 474 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Business Intelligence
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
ThoughtSpot is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for BI evaluation queries because it has strong G2 authority (321 reviews, 4.4★) and visible first-party comparison content (e.g., “Looker vs Tableau” and “Looker vs Power BI” pages). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led comparison pages specifically for “ThoughtSpot vs Microsoft Power BI” and “ThoughtSpot vs Looker” (and ensure they’re crawlable/SSR), because that query pattern is where AI engines most often need a directly citable evaluation source.
Based on audit of thoughtspot.com · Apr 2, 2026