[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Thoughtspot
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

77

across 491 prompts

AI Share of Voice

80%

across 473 prompts

Category Visibility

#6

in Business Intelligence · of 148

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
331 category
Cited89%293/331
Share of voice81%avg
Engine consensus43%of engines
Competitors3.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
14 brand-level
Cited29%4/14
Share of voice29%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited50%4/8
Share of voice50%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited20%1/5
Share of voice20%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Thoughtspot is visible in

2
  • Business Intelligence6 of 148→
  • AI-Driven Analyticsnot yet measured→

Executive summary

ThoughtSpot is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for BI evaluation queries because it has strong G2 authority (321 reviews, 4.4★) and visible first-party comparison content (e.g., “Looker vs Tableau” and “Looker vs Power BI” pages). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led comparison pages specifically for “ThoughtSpot vs Microsoft Power BI” and “ThoughtSpot vs Looker” (and ensure they’re crawlable/SSR), because that query pattern is where AI engines most often need a directly citable evaluation source.

Based on audit of thoughtspot.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy