AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Office & Productivity
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 449 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 449 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Office & Productivity
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories TextExpander is visible in
1Executive summary
TextExpander is already well-positioned for AI citation in evaluation and trust queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., Capterra 4.7/5 with 63 reviews; TrustRadius 9.6/10 with 11 reviews) and a crawlable, tiered pricing page. The biggest risk is conversion-stage “branded pricing” and “integration/MCP” queries where AI needs first-party structured signals (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/LLM-ready context) and crawlable integration pages; the single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B-focused structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage + Organization sameAs) across product/pricing pages and ensure AI crawlers can access them.
Based on audit of textexpander.com · Jun 6, 2026