AI Visibility
measured49/100
Frequently Cited · in Payment Processing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals52/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
61
across 582 prompts
AI Share of Voice
61%
across 582 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Payment Processing
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Terminal is visible in
2Executive summary
Terminal.io has strong AI-citation foundations for evaluation-stage queries via its G2 presence (26 reviews, 4.7★) in the Staffing Services category. The biggest risk for AI engines is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage crawlability: pricing appears to be “contact for current rates” on the FAQ page, and the site’s structured-data/technical AEO signals (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/SSR crawlability) could not be verified via live search, limiting eligibility for “How much does Terminal cost?” and “best global hiring services software…” shortlists.
Based on audit of terminal.io · Oct 9, 2026