AI Visibility
measured53/100
Frequently Cited · in Resource Planning
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
99
across 541 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 524 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Resource Planning
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Tempo.io is a B2B SaaS with strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (246 reviews, 4.2/5) and first-party evaluation content like “Asana vs. Tempo” plus publicly crawlable pricing with explicit per-user tiers. The biggest AI-visibility risk is that some high-intent evaluation surfaces (e.g., TrustRadius profile details, robots.txt/llms.txt verification, and enterprise analyst signals) were not confirmed in live checks—so AI engines may cite Tempo inconsistently for “alternatives to Tempo” and “Tempo pricing” shortlists.
Based on audit of tempo.io · Oct 7, 2026