AI Visibility
measured41/100
Frequently Cited · in Scheduling & Calendar
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
10
across 171 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 155 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Scheduling & Calendar
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories TeamSnap is visible in
1Executive summary
TeamSnap is already cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries via strong third-party review presence (notably G2 and Capterra) and has public, crawlable pricing for at least the single-team tier. The biggest risk pattern is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “pricing + comparison” queries (e.g., “TeamSnap pricing” and “TeamSnap vs SportsEngine/TeamSideline”) where first-party comparison coverage and machine-readable structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) appear thin or missing.
Based on audit of teamsnap.com · Aug 29, 2026