AI Visibility
measured35/100
Emerging · in Wiki & Docs
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals53/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
29
across 227 prompts
AI Share of Voice
29%
across 227 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Wiki & Docs
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
tango.ai is a B2B SaaS with strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (498 reviews) and first-party evaluation content (multiple “Tango vs …” pages plus a public pricing page with per-user tiers). The biggest risk for AI shortlists is missing/weak structured-data + technical AI-crawl signals (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/robots/llms.txt not verifiable from live search), which can prevent models from confidently citing conversion-stage details.
Based on audit of tango.ai · Jun 6, 2026