AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Identity & Access Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals3/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
29
across 379 prompts
AI Share of Voice
29%
across 379 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Identity & Access Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Tailscale is visible in
2Executive summary
Tailscale is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries like “Tailscale vs alternatives” because it has first-party comparison coverage on its /compare page and strong third-party review presence on G2. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured-data + crawlability signals for AI evaluation (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/Offer) and ensure AI crawlers can access the key pages (robots.txt/llms.txt), since those directly gate whether pricing and evaluation content can be cited.
Based on audit of tailscale.com · Sep 30, 2026