[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/SUSE Linux Enterprise Server
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

58

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

5

across 266 prompts

AI Share of Voice

2%

across 250 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
249 brand-level
Cited2%4/249
Share of voice2%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories SUSE Linux Enterprise Server is visible in

1
  • IT & Service Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

SUSE is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence on G2 (e.g., SUSE Linux Enterprise Server: 72 reviews, 4.6/5) and meaningful enterprise analyst signals (Gartner Peer Insights product page exists; SUSE also claims Leader status in a 2024 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Container Management). ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/products/suse-linux-enterprise-server/reviews?utm_source=openai)) The single highest-ROI fix is to improve first-party evaluation content for “vs/alternatives/pricing” queries—right now pricing is often “request pricing”/partner-quote oriented, which reduces AI’s ability to cite concrete tiers for conversion prompts. ([suse.com](https://www.suse.com/how-to-buy/?utm_source=openai))

Based on audit of suse.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy