AI Visibility
measured43/100
Frequently Cited · in CRM
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 215 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 192 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in CRM
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
SuperOffice is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage prompts because it has a large G2 presence (154 reviews, 4.4★) and has crawlable, transparent pricing with tiered per-user/month amounts. The biggest citation risk is missing/unclear structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and lack of first-party, explicitly indexed “[Brand] vs Salesforce/HubSpot” pages that are clearly designed as evaluation comparison surfaces (the HubSpot comparison exists, but broader competitor-specific coverage and schema support appear thin). Highest-ROI fix: implement SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema across product/pricing/comparison pages and expand first-party comparison pages that directly target “How does SuperOffice compare to Salesforce?” and “How does SuperOffice compare to HubSpot?” with self-contained answer blocks.
Based on audit of superoffice.com · Apr 1, 2026