AI Visibility
measured34/100
Emerging · in CRM
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals12/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
22
across 259 prompts
AI Share of Voice
22%
across 259 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Crm Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in CRM
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories SugarCRM is visible in
1Your visibility gap
SugarCRM surfaces in 0/80 Crm discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
SugarCRM is a B2B CRM vendor with strong third-party authority (G2 profile exists with 5 reviews and 4.2★ per your pre-verified context) and it has first-party comparison content like “Salesforce Comparison” and “SugarCRM vs. HubSpot”. The highest-risk citation pattern is evaluation-stage “best CRM software” / “alternatives to SugarCRM” shortlist inclusion for AI engines—your site is missing high-intent discovery coverage for buyer questions like “CRM for customer retention strategies” and “top CRM tools for sales teams”; the single highest-ROI fix is to publish crawlable, evaluation-ready FAQ/guide pages that directly answer those gap queries and interlink to the existing “How does SugarCRM compare to Salesforce?” and “How does SugarCRM compare to HubSpot?” pages.
Based on audit of sugarcrm.com · May 1, 2026