AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Privacy & Data Governance
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals54/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
6
across 314 prompts
AI Share of Voice
6%
across 314 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Privacy & Data Governance
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
SpyCloud is already strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage queries via its G2 presence (14 reviews, 4.7★) and first-party comparison content like “SpyCloud vs. Recorded Future.” The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand crawlable, schema-rich evaluation pages for pricing and “alternatives”/“worth it” intent (including SoftwareApplication + FAQPage targeting), because the pricing page is mostly “request pricing” and does not expose concrete tier prices to AI engines. ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/sellers/spycloud?utm_source=openai))
Based on audit of spycloud.com · Jun 13, 2026