AI Visibility
measured58/100
Frequently Cited · in Spend Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals18/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
40
across 368 prompts
AI Share of Voice
40%
across 368 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Spend Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Spendesk is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has substantial G2 presence (413 reviews) and secondary review coverage on TrustRadius (17 reviews) and Capterra. The biggest risk for AI engines is conversion-stage citation: the first-party pricing page is publicly crawlable but appears to be quote/contact-heavy for key pricing details, and there is no clear evidence (from live search) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage-style structured evaluation content that would reliably power “pricing” and “vs/alternatives” answers.
Based on audit of spendesk.com · Jun 10, 2026