[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Spendesk
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

18

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

31

across 344 prompts

AI Share of Voice

31%

across 344 prompts

Category Visibility

#21

in Spend Management · of 95

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
203 category
Cited26%52/203
Share of voice19%avg
Engine consensus44%of engines
Competitors14.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Spendesk is visible in

2
  • Spend Management21 of 95→
  • Expense Management33 of 108→

Executive summary

Spendesk is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has substantial G2 presence (413 reviews) and secondary review coverage on TrustRadius (17 reviews) and Capterra. The biggest risk for AI engines is conversion-stage citation: the first-party pricing page is publicly crawlable but appears to be quote/contact-heavy for key pricing details, and there is no clear evidence (from live search) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage-style structured evaluation content that would reliably power “pricing” and “vs/alternatives” answers.

Based on audit of spendesk.com · Jun 10, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy